Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): June
Articles

Distraksi Digital dan Konsentrasi Belajar Generasi Alpha di Era Digital

Selvi Selvi
Universitas At Taqwa Bondowoso
Tazkia Adeline Faza
Universitas At-Taqwa Bondowoso
Ansori Ansori
Universitas At-Taqwa Bondowoso

Published 2026-06-30

Keywords

  • Distraksi Digital,
  • Generasi Alpha,
  • Konsentrasi Belajar

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital membentuk pola belajar baru pada siswa Generasi Alpha yang sejak dini akrab dengan perangkat digital. Di samping memberikan kemudahan akses informasi dan pengalaman belajar interaktif, kondisi ini juga memunculkan distraksi digital yang berpotensi menurunkan konsentrasi belajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bentuk distraksi digital, faktor penyebab, serta dampaknya terhadap konsentrasi belajar siswa Generasi Alpha melalui kajian literatur. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode library research. Data diperoleh dari artikel jurnal nasional dan internasional serta publikasi ilmiah yang relevan dan dianalisis menggunakan content analysis melalui tahap reduksi data, kategorisasi, interpretasi, dan sintesis. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa distraksi digital terutama muncul dalam bentuk media multitasking, notifikasi digital, konsumsi konten berbasis algoritma, dan perpindahan perhatian selama pembelajaran. Faktor penyebab utamanya meliputi tingginya intensitas penggunaan teknologi, karakteristik platform digital, dan rendahnya kemampuan regulasi diri siswa. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya strategi pedagogis adaptif yang mengintegrasikan literasi digital dan penguatan regulasi diri agar teknologi dapat dimanfaatkan secara optimal tanpa mengurangi kualitas konsentrasi belajar.

References

  1. Aaron, L. S., & Lipton, T. (2018a). Digital Distraction: Shedding Light on the 21st-Century College Classroom. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239517736876
  2. Adams, D. M., & Clark, D. B. (2014). Integrating self-explanation functionality into a complex game environment: Keeping gaming in motion. Computers & Education, 73, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.002
  3. Ahn, D., & Shin, D.-H. (2013). Is the social use of media for seeking connectedness or for avoiding social isolation? Mechanisms underlying media use and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2453–2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.022
  4. Borkhoff, C. M., Hawker, G. A., Kreder, H. J., Glazier, R. H., Mahomed, N. N., & Wright, J. G. (2009a). Patients’ gender affected physicians’ clinical decisions when presented with standardized patients but not for matching paper patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(5), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.009
  5. Farkas, D., & Orosz, G. (2013). The link between ego-resiliency and changes in Big Five traits after decision making: The case of Extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(4), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.003
  6. Fryer, L. K., Nakao, K., & Thompson, A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.023
  7. Gegenfurtner, A., & Seppänen, M. (2013). Transfer of expertise: An eye tracking and think aloud study using dynamic medical visualizations. Computers & Education, 63, 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.021
  8. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  9. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  10. Kalyuga, S. (2009). Knowledge elaboration: A cognitive load perspective. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.003
  11. Lin, H., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Wu, F.-G. (2016). A study on the relationships between different presentation modes of graphical icons and users’ attention. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.008
  12. Lombart, C., Millan, E., Normand, J.-M., Verhulst, A., Labbé-Pinlon, B., & Moreau, G. (2020). Effects of physical, non-immersive virtual, and immersive virtual store environments on consumers’ perceptions and purchase behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106374
  13. Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., & Fischer, F. (2011). Stretching the limits in help-seeking research: Theoretical, methodological, and technological advances. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.002
  14. Martin, A. J. (2011). Prescriptive Statements and Educational Practice: What Can Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Offer? Educational Psychology Review, 23(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9160-0
  15. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369
  16. Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014a). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
  17. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009a). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
  18. Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019a). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1
  19. Raffle, H., Revelle, G., Mori, K., Ballagas, R., Buza, K., Horii, H., Kaye, J., Cook, K., Freed, N., Go, J., & Spasojevic, M. (2011a). Hello, is grandma there? let’s read! StoryVisit. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979121
  20. Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive Architectures for Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_2
  21. Ronny Gunawan, Maya Zaina Billah, Rosiani Silalahi, & Henrik Tuka. (2024). Gaya Belajar Gen Alpha di Era Digital. Dewantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, 3(4), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v3i4.3661
  22. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.763
  23. Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003
  24. Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2018). An opportunity for self-replication. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 603–603. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0405-5
  25. Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(385), 240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2288384
  26. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  27. Tu, Y.-F., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Trends and research issues of mobile learning studies in hospitality, leisure, sport and tourism education: a review of academic publications from 2002 to 2017. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1528285
  28. Valencia, J., Macias, J., & Valencia, A. (2015). Formative Research in Higher Education: Some Reflections. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 940–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.562
  29. Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462
  30. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2