Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): June
Articles

Analisis Kebiasaan Belajar Digital Siswa dan Implikasinya terhadap Fokus Pembelajaran

PDF
  • Nur Aini,
  • Syindie Wulan Ramadani,
  • Ansori Ansori
Nur Aini
Institut Agama Islam At-Taqwa
Syindie Wulan Ramadani
Institut Agama Islam At-Taqwa
Ansori Ansori
Institut Agama Islam At-Taqwa

Published 2026-06-29

Keywords

  • Kebiasaan Belajar Digital,
  • Fokus Pembelajaran,
  • Media Digital,
  • Siswa,
  • Teknologi Pendidikan

Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Aini, Syindie Wulan Ramadani, Ansori Ansori (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah mengubah kebiasaan belajar siswa dalam memperoleh informasi dan memahami materi pembelajaran. Penggunaan perangkat digital seperti smartphone, laptop, dan media sosial memberikan kemudahan akses terhadap sumber belajar, tetapi juga berpotensi menurunkan fokus belajar siswa akibat distraksi yang berlebihan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebiasaan belajar digital siswa serta implikasinya terhadap fokus pembelajaran. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kuantitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui angket dan observasi. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas siswa sekolah menengah yang aktif menggunakan media digital dalam kegiatan belajar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebiasaan belajar digital memberikan dampak positif berupa kemudahan akses informasi, peningkatan fleksibilitas belajar, dan pemanfaatan media interaktif. Namun, intensitas penggunaan media sosial dan multitasking digital yang tinggi dapat menurunkan konsentrasi serta fokus siswa selama proses pembelajaran berlangsung. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengawasan, pengelolaan waktu, dan pemanfaatan teknologi secara bijak agar penggunaan media digital dapat mendukung efektivitas pembelajaran secara optimal.

PDF

References

  1. Barbour, R. (2007). Doing Focus Groups. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208956
  2. Bickman, L., & Rog, D. (2009). The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858
  3. Calma, A., & Davies, M. (2021). Critical thinking in business education: current outlook and future prospects. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2279–2295. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1716324
  4. Chonokhuu, S., Batbold, C., Chuluunpurev, B., Battsengel, E., Dorjsuren, B., & Byambaa, B. (2019). Contamination and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Soil of Major Cities in Mongolia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142552
  5. Çikrıkci, Ö. (2016a). The effect of internet use on well-being: Meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.021
  6. Çikrıkci, Ö. (2016b). The effect of internet use on well-being: Meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.021
  7. Daleiden, B. K., Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2025). A Self-Regulated Learning Perspective on Smartphone Presence, Usage, and Multitasking While Studying. Education Sciences, 15(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020128
  8. Deng, L., Zhou, Y., & Broadbent, J. (2024). Distraction, multitasking and self-regulation inside university classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 23957–23979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12786-w
  9. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The Research Act. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
  10. Guo, Z., Liu, K., Liang, C., Li, D., Lou, J., Deng, Y., & Huang, M. (2024). Validation of the Chinese version of the Smartphone Distraction Scale. Heliyon, 10(11), e31807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31807
  11. Hall, J. A., & Pennington, N. (2013a). Self-monitoring, honesty, and cue use on Facebook: The relationship with user extraversion and conscientiousness. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1556–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.001
  12. Hall, J. A., & Pennington, N. (2013b). Self-monitoring, honesty, and cue use on Facebook: The relationship with user extraversion and conscientiousness. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1556–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.001
  13. Hartley, K., Bendixen, L. D., Gianoutsos, D., & Shreve, E. (2020). The smartphone in self-regulated learning and student success: clarifying relationships and testing an intervention. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00230-1
  14. Hefter, M. H. (2024). Note-taking fosters distance video learning: smartphones as risk and intellectual values as protective factors. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 16962. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67898-7
  15. Jin, Y., Zhou, W., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., & Hussain, Z. (2024). Smartphone Distraction and Academic Anxiety: The Mediating Role of Academic Procrastination and the Moderating Role of Time Management Disposition. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090820
  16. Jyothi, S., McAvinia, C., & Keating, J. (2012). A visualisation tool to aid exploration of students’ interactions in asynchronous online communication. Computers & Education, 58(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.026
  17. Liao, H.-H., Liu, T.-C., & Lin, Y.-C. (2026). External and internal smartphone distractions: Effects on phone use and learning performance in college classrooms. Instructional Science, 54(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09794-3
  18. Masduki, Y., & Johari, M. E. (2025). Digital Learning Fatigue and Academic Motivation in Students at Ahmad Dahlan University Yogyakarta. Jurnal Tarbiyatuna, 16(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v16i2.15261
  19. Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014a). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
  20. Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014b). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
  21. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009a). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
  22. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009b). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
  23. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009c). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
  24. Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009d). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
  25. Paterna, A., Alcaraz-Ibáñez, M., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Salavera, C., Demetrovics, Z., & Griffiths, M. D. (2024). Problematic smartphone use and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 13(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2024.00014
  26. Rajput, R. (2025). The double-edged sword of digital learning: Internet usage and study behaviors in Indian adolescents. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530251399880
  27. Thompson, P. (2013a). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
  28. Thompson, P. (2013b). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
  29. Thompson, P. (2013c). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022
  30. Troll, E. S., Friese, M., & Loschelder, D. D. (2021). How students’ self-control and smartphone-use explain their academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 106624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106624
  31. Wolff, S. M., Wright, D. B., & Hatcher, W. J. (2024). Task-irrelevant visual distractions and mindful self-regulated learning in a low-stakes computer-based assessment. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1360848
  32. Zhou, Y., & Deng, L. (2024). Breaking free from the “digital rabbit hole”: A configurational analysis of in-class smartphone distraction among university students. The Internet and Higher Education, 62, 100949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100949